





Reporter's Notebook
Maps:
Greater Kanpur
Sewage System
SideTexts:
Rajiv Gandhi 1985
Ganga Action Plan
How a UASB works
Dirty vs Polluted
REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK
The first thing I notice is
how shallow the river is in Kanpur. The culprit is, of course, lack of adequate
flow.
In recent years, Ganga has swung away from the city and only returns just
below Sirsalya Ghat. The whole waterfront is a mixture of broken concrete,
untapped drains and piles of garbage tossed over garden walls.
Between the main river and the ‘nullah-that-calls-itself-Ganga’
are substantial sandbanks. A small group of men are bathing on the far side.
The bathers begin by blaming the government for the state of the river here.
So much so normal.
But then they accept part of the blame. “If
we stopped throwing our trash into the river it would soon get cleaned up!”
This admission is unusual.
In theory fairly easy to regulate: banning people
from disposing of their plastic bags (trash) in the river. But of course it’s
anything but! A local environmental group called Eco-Friends has been promoting
just such a programme here, but with only moderate success. The river’s
just too convenient a dumping ground. Besides, there’s an entire economic
subculture that lives from producing or recycling these gossamer-thin plastic
bags. The Indian government can ban sale of ultra-light plastic bags, but
how many lives will be sacrificed as a consequence? And if they ban plastic
bags ten millimetres thick then tomorrow factories will start producing plastic
nine millimetres thick.
Another bather says the religious belief that
Ganga can purify herself of pollution has some validity - but only to a certain
extent. It isn’t carte blanche to continue dumping indiscriminately.
This is an interesting answer because there
is solid scientific evidence that the river can indeed absorb a surprising
amount of organic waste. Not inorganic waste from the tanneries at the southern
end of the city. Nobody can figure out how to do that yet! Everybody loves
to blame the tanneries for all the pollution, even if it’s upstream!
One Sunday morning, Rakesh
Jaiswal asks me to come and take a look at Kanpur’s sewage system in
the raw. Rakesh has been militating in Kanpur for fifteen years to try and
increase public awareness about the need to do something to clean up Ganga.
Earlier this week, Rakesh made an alarming discovery.
So we pile into the Scorpio and head for Dapkah
Nullah, just beyond the golf course where my friend Chutku plays religiously
at five thirty every morning. We bump down an earthen track towards the river
and park near a small Shiva temple at the edge of Ganga. It’s a beautiful
scene - a whitewashed temple in an oasis of calm inside the bustling city.
Beyond it is a nullah - a stream flowing into
Ganga. We follow the nullah back up fifty yards. I hear a dull roar. We clamber
up the bank: the roar suddenly becomes reality - a waterfall tumbles out of
the shattered brickwork of the Kanpur municipal main trunk sewer, five feet
in diameter. It’s severed almost in two: the whole city’s raw
sewage is cascading down into the nullah twenty feet below.
‘Rakesh, how long has this been broken?
Why doesn’t the municipality repair it? Does the city know?’
‘I got to know of this only on Thursday.
The water authorities have no idea. But I think it has been broken for some
weeks.’
We climb down to what remains of the brick pipe.
Rakesh explains: ‘This is the main trunk sewer for the whole city. All
the sewage from the city is carried through this to the Sewage Treatment Plant.
It has completely failed and now raw sewage is going to the river directly.’
He repeats those last words with huge contempt: ‘ Raw sewage.’
The main aorta of the city’s sewage system
has burst. It’s heart - the Sewage Treatment Plant at Jajmao - can’t
be getting much blood at all. There’s still some liquid flowing in the
unbroken bottom of the massive pipe. But no more than a quarter of what should
be in the pipe.
Rakesh has pleaded with Jal Nigam [Municipal
Water Authority] to carry out regular maintenance. But Jal Nigam simply throw
up their hands and say they’re starved for funds. Lucknow in turn says
it doesn’t have the cash for maintenance. Everyone, from the Pollution
Control board to Jal Nigam to the Mayor of Kanpur, sings from the same song
book. The end result: a smelly mix pouring directly into the river.
We walk back up to the Scorpio. Down at the
Shiva temple a gaggle of geese are inspecting the Ganga lapping against the
beach. On the sand are discarded clay idols.
The water in the nullah is oily and black from
the waterfall fifty yards above. It’s pouring out into the river. But
oil and water don’t mix. There are in fact two distinct rivers, visible
even to the unobservant eye - a black Ganga flowing out of the nullah into
the milk chocolate Ganga, side by side as far as the eye can see. Visually,
it reminds me of Devaprayag, except it’s not the (fairly) pristine mountain
torrents of the Alaknanda and the Bhaghirathi, but raw sewage and a sluggish,
muddy river.
Even the geese wandering round the
shrine sense something is not quite right: they waddle down to the water’s
edge, but then think better of it. They don’t want to swim in this muck.
With much vociferous protest they waddle away from the water, heading downstream
in search of something rather more appetizing.
Bijoy Tivari is visibly shaken: a few days before
he’d filled plastic bottles with Ganga jal, presumably for drinking.
He now goes back to the Scorpio, takes them out, goes down to the river and
pours them mournfully back into the river.
‘Tivari chalo chalo. I want you to look
at mother Ganga. Would you take a dip in this?’
Tivari looks insulted I’d even ask the question. ‘No, no, not
here. It is very dirty water right here. I won’t take a dip.’
‘Why not? Remember this is a holy river.
It can clean itself.’
He won’t bite. ‘Yes, what you say
is right. The river has the purifying capacity but here it’s very much
obvious and visible that it’s raw sewage. It’s not the Ganges
water. Maybe a few kilometres in the downstream when all these pollutants
will get diluted then I can think of having a dip.’
If this isn’t bad enough, a hundred yards
away on the cliff overlooking Ganga another huge pipe is pouring a dark oily
liquid directly into the river below. How come? It can’t be raw sewage
because the trunk sewer that would feed it is broken.
‘This is directly from the tanneries.
See how blue it is. This is untreated chromium.’ Rakesh looks angry.
This site visit confirms an unwelcome truth he’s probably suspected
for some time. Many tanneries can’t be treating their chromium waste,
as they endlessly tell the outside world. Otherwise, this would be fairly
clear water.
Rakesh is by now very angry. His hunch is, that
it’s pure, raw effluent going directly into the river. But just yesterday
VK Sinha at the Jal Nigam had assured me the opposite. Rakesh is contemptuous:
‘A total lie. I will show you other drains which are also carrying toxic
tannery effluent and contaminating the Ganges water.’
We’ve parked near one of four Shiva temples
in Kanpur. Rakesh jokes: ‘I don’t know how Shiva would be feeling
about this stench. He has to watch the discharge of raw and toxic sewage directly
into Ganga which he brought down from Heaven through his hair!’
The Ganga Action Plan mandated
electric crematoria in many cities. A friend tells me that in Delhi two thirds
of cremations actually take place in these electric crematoria. At Nimtala
Ghat in Kolkata the ratio is also roughly one is to three in favour of electric
crematoria. In Varanasi the electric crematorium next to Harishchandra Ghat
seems largely idle, while fifty yards away the traditional funeral pyres are
in regular use.
There are two official cremation areas in Kanpur
- Bhairon Ghat and this one at Jajmao, where the local dhoms, called dhanuks
in Kanpur, perform the needful on the beach. Rakesh has worked with them before,
when his group led a campaign to fish out dead bodies and clean up Ganga.
Disposing of dead bodies in Ganga sounds lazy.
But there are several obvious reasons why you’d want to avoid having
to pay even a modest fee of several hundred rupees. Poverty (it costs a minimum
of five hundred rupees in wood); accident (you drown or accidentally fall
in); or simple practicality (you need to dispose of a body on the quiet).
And dead bodies can also include cows and other large animals which fall into
the river and drown.
On the beach in Jajmao a dhanuk called Munar
explains they now bury the ashes of those they have burned. Near the waterline
are three fresh mounds - bodies they have fished out of the river this morning,
proof that someone is listening to Rakesh’s campaign to clean up Ganga.
Munar admits that the condition of the river
is now so foul that rituals themselves are having to change. When families
bring bodies for cremation they often bring their own water with them to wash
the body. They’ve seen the condition of Ganga, even in mid-channel.
The relations and friends of the deceased are also supposed to take a dip
when they bring a body for cremation. They now go back home and take a shower
instead. Much like using a few drops of Ganga jal in various everyday rituals.
I can see why purists feel it’s the thin edge of the wedge.
A truck bumps down the paved
road to the beach, followed by several cars. Men of all ages bundle out and
carry a light stretcher covering a dead body down to the edge of the river.
Normally, they would push it out so that the river could wash the body. Definitely
not here today.
RK Awasthi says he won’t be taking a dip
in Ganga, even though he’s supposed to. ‘It’s a pucca, dirty
water. We are supposed to take a bath here, but I will take it back home.
This is dirty, very dirty water.’
What about the traditional washing of the body
in Ganga? A real dilemma:
‘We have to avoid all this, but we are
bound. What to do?’
The solution: ‘I take the water from either
hand pump or we bring the water from the house and that way we are giving
bath to the dead body.’
‘But then you’re not performing
the ritual correctly,’ I point out.
‘You are very right, I mean one hundred
percent. But we are bound.’
His voice tails off. Change the subject please!
Rakesh asks him why he isn’t up in arms against this pollution of Ganga.
A delicate subject. ‘If we protest there
will be a riot.’
The tanneries cause the pollution, but who works
and lives in the tanneries? Muslims. Accusing the tanneries of pollution is
therefore code for a not-so indirect attack on the so-called minority community.
The main political parties jump in and the whole thing quickly becomes a public
mess. His friend KP Chauhan sees this in very personal terms:
‘We are small people, if we complain they
will kill us and throw our bodies in this Gangaji.’
Some of these problems - the
toxic waste from the tanneries and the very real political repercussions -
are not present up at Bhairon Ghat at the other end of town. This is very
different from Jajmao. It’s a much older cremation ghat, added on over
the years with a paved road, a parking lot, marble and stone floors, two raised
slabs on which bodies are washed with groundwater, a large central covered
area for the actual burning of the body.
But the rituals, the problems, and above all
the adaptations are similar to Jajmao. Until Ganga was diverted in 2005 through
the new barrage, the only water Bhairon Ghat received regularly was from the already-deficient channel and highly dubious discharge from an untapped drain
from a local tuberculosis clinic.
The gates open and a Tata pickup delivers a
load of fresh wood. I’m curious so I go up to Shivkumar Tewari - the
head pandit:
‘How long does it take to burn a body?
Any idea?’
‘Three hours, if it’s thin and skinny.
Longer if it’s got some fat to burn!’ he replies.
Bodies are washed on the two shining white marble
slabs, then burned in the covered area. A family is sifting through the ashes
of an earlier cremation, looking for phool, or the ash and unburned bit of
bones, euphemistically called flowers. These are then collected in an urn
or pot. They are the mortal remains of a person that will be carried to the
edge of Ganga for the last rituals. Mr Tewari chants slokas so that the souls
of both the dead person and the family will attain peace.
One family member tells me he will take a dip
here in Ganga after the ceremony. ‘The river is dirty yes, polluted
no. (Some sort of window where explanation in footnote can be read How can
she be polluted? She is Gangaji, she is holy to us. This is our mother. We
don’t think that mother can ever be polluted.’
Next door is the imposing electric crematorium,
gates padlocked. No one answers the bell. Shivkumar Tewari says they don’t
turn up until after lunch anyway. Is it competition for him? ‘No way.
Only the reformist Hindus such as the Arya Samaj use it.’ It costs too
much to burn a body there.
Shivkumar Tewari’s traditional crematorium
still averages ten bodies a day:
‘Many people prefer that certain rituals
be performed before cremation. So, traditionally people like to cremate their
dead on a wooden pyre.’ He adds mischievously: ‘People don’t
like the electric. I think a lot of the bodies burned there are basically
unclaimed anyway.’
I’m curious about the economics of cremation.
How much does it actually cost?
‘A conventional cremation at this Ghat
costs around six to seven hundred rupees, including wood. That’s the
single most expensive item and the one in shortest supply. It takes four to
five quintals of wood to burn a body. At today’s rates that’s
five hundred rupees - and we’re not talking sandalwood but ordinary
wood. Of course, the softer the wood the more you’ll need because it
will burn quicker.’
The electric crematorium used to be a lot cheaper
- twenty-five rupees a body. But the Allahabad High Court ordered the city
to raise the fee for the electric crematoria from twenty five rupees a cremation
to five hundred rupees. While even the poorest of the poor can afford the
former, those fees were totally inadequate to pay for the actual costs of
running the electric crematorium. As a consequence the building was more or
less closed for twenty years. Even today the gates are more often padlocked
than open. The price differential has almost vanished: it now costs virtually
the same, however you cremate the body. And the traditional method doesn’t
involve load-shedding.
‘No one over there,’ Shivkumar jerks
his head towards to the electric crematorium, ‘of course, ever performs
the sanatana dharma. We’re much more adapted to the modern world than
they are. My elder brother has even conducted rituals with a family in the
USA, using a landline phone! Before mobiles! Part of the family here, part
over there, and he saying the slokas into the phone.’
A few days later, Rakesh and
I drive down to the Combined Effluent Treatment Plant complex at Jajmao. When
I’d visited it a few years previously I’d been quite impressed
by its working efficiency. Today, the place appears shut down. The only visible
sign of activity are a few workers playing cricket on the lawns. They tell
me they’ve not been paid for four months by the state. So they’ve
gone on strike in the autumn sunshine on a ‘glorified time pass.’
All three treatment plants have stopped functioning.
The Jal Nigam say they haven’t received any funds from Lucknow so they
can’t pay any salaries, even their own. I would feel more sympathy if
it wasn’t for a large clean vacant administrative building at the entrance
of the complex marked, Administrative Building UP Jal Nigam. This was constructed
with Ganga Action Plan funds but now the UP Jal Nigam office is right at the
other end of the city, nowhere near the river they are supposed to regulate.
Meanwhile they pay heavy rent for a vacant building,
from where they could be on top of things. They’d see at first hand
how little wastewater is actually coming into the plant because that main
trunk sewer is broken. They’d also surely notice that tannery waste
containing hexavalent chromium is going directly into the river because no
plants are working. They’d also see that the machinery inside the sewage
treatment plant is visibly rusting. If the strike continues much longer, those
machines will start to resemble an animal skeleton, picked clean by predators
and bleached white by the sun.
I think all this has come as a terrible shock
to Rakesh. He just wanders round, shaking his head, muttering a mantra of
despair. If only the Jal Nigam had kept their office manned here in Jajmao!
But nobody in government seem aware that the whole plant has been idle for
months! They know about the strike, but profess total ignorance about its
effect on the plant. Anyway, to a man they (the Pollution Control Board, the
Jal Nigam, the Mayor) all throw up their hands and lament impotently:
‘It’s not my responsibility!’
Part of the problem is water and sewer rates
are still far too low. They were set in the nineteenth century. Although they’ve
been raised recently, politicians are naturally reluctant to be seen raising
taxes, any taxes.
Popular wisdom blames political corruption but
Rakesh Jaiswal thinks public apathy is the real culprit. He simply cannot
understand why the citizens of Kanpur don’t rise up against all the
public institutions that are responsible for cleaning and maintaining the
river: ‘Why don’t they demand accountability, raise water taxes,
stop throwing their garbage directly into the river?’
Plain ignorance too often rules.
One day on the river I stop
and talk with Tanga Lal who is performing his pooja at Bhagwandas Ghat. He’s
been coming here every morning for most of his sixty-eight years. He says
all the right things: things like ‘Those who pollute are sinners,’
while pouring milk from a plastic bag into Ganga ‘to feed her.’
When the bag’s empty he casually throws it too into the river.
‘Why do you just do that, if you know
you are sinning?’
Tanga Lal is immediately contrite.
‘I will stop as of today. Ganga is my
mother! I worship her for peace of mind. You are right, Sir. I will no longer
pollute my mother.’
Somehow I doubt it.
Tanga Lal can’t help himself or change
the habits of a lifetime. And he really doesn’t understand why pouring
milk into Ganga is a form of pollution. For him it is showing respect for
his mother.
Raja exhorts Tanga Lal to spread the word. I
think it would be in vain. Tanga Lal admits as much: ‘I will tell them,
tell them sir. But the public here, does not agree sir.’ Raja sternly
admonishes him: ‘We have to make them agree.’
Tanga Lal repeats his simple statement:
‘The public here does not agree.’
A little bit further downstream we pull in to
chat with some dhobis rhythmically beating the hell out of someone’s
clothes on flat stones propped up at the river’s edge.
Washing powder contains phosphates.
Everyone knows that. Most people in the West also know phosphates and caustic
soda are harmful. They’ve been banned from all laundry detergents not
least because they stimulate the wrong sort of algae blooms. But word hasn’t
reached the dhobis on Ghola Ghat. Mithai Lal is proud that his family have
been washing clothes for as long as he can remember.
‘Yes, of course we use detergent powder.
It is good.’
‘You don’t think it’s harmful
to Ganga?’
The conversation takes on a surrealistic tone:
‘It is good because it cleans Ganga. It
kills all the germs and small insects. It bleaches the water. See the dirty
water coming from the nullah. This is sewage, shit. This is what is killing
the water. But we are cleaning Ganga, with these detergents and caustic sodas
and acids.’
Of course Ganga is pure and yes, in case you
doubted, Mitha Lal does indeed drink Ganga jal daily and never gets sick.
We pull up back in to Sati Chaura Ghat and are
drinking chai, gazing out at the river, talking with our boatman Bhagwan about
the on-going campaign to prevent people using the river as a dumping ground
for their plastic bags. A young Gurkha soldier from the nearby Cantonment
strides up to the Ghat, throws a ball of flowers and plastic bags as far out
into the river as he can, turns round and marches briskly off back to the
barracks.
Just when you thought it can’t
get any worse, we’re invited to Motipur village a few kilometres inland
from Jajmao. The sewage treatment plant has been sending treated waste water
through canals to irrigate the fields in local villages, and charging for
it.
Mohammad Owais, one of Rakesh Jaiswal’s
assistants and himself the son of a small tannery owner, explains that the
irrigation water used to be 50:50 Ganga river water and raw sewage. Now it’s
one hundred percent sewage, including the supposedly chromium-free treated
effluent. In theory this should be okay, because anything harmful will have
been removed at the sewage treatment plant.
But not if hexavalent chromium is still flowing
from the tanneries to the plant, and out again into the irrigation water.
The plants can’t remove hexavalent chromium, so the new “improved”
irrigation water will be toxic and lethal.
In 2002, the National Botanical Research Institute
in Lucknow found Cr(VI) in the groundwater and soil in the villages around
Jajmao. More recently, the Facility for Ecological and Analytical Testing
at IIT-Kanpur carried out more detailed testing, and it’s bad, very
bad. Hexavalent chromium and a whole host of other heavy metals - cadmium,
mercury - are now in the food chain. The villages all rely on that irrigation
water from the plant for their fields and animals. At least, Jal Nigam has
had the decency to suspend payments.
Motipur is probably the worst-affected being nearest to the main irrigation
canal. Walk down the main road in Motipur village and all you’ll see
are buffaloes. Motipur supplies much of the milk for Kanpur.
We go to the clinic of the village doctor Parshuram
Yadav. He also covers all the surrounding villages. The total affected population
is forty thousand. Of those he says three thousand are sick because of the
irrigation water. Sickness means the usual skin diseases, eczema, stomach
worms. But in Motipur things are worse. The ground water is now contaminated
down to a depth of forty feet. They have to sink deep-bore tube wells to a
depth of twelve hundred feet to find pure drinking water, and at their own
expense. They could go after the Jal Nigam or the Dutch. But people are understandably
reluctant to go to court because the effort could take a lifetime.
Dr Yadav’s treating ten new patients a
day with symptoms of Cr(VI) poisoning. We tramp down Motipur’s main
street. He points out a two-year-old buffalo that is so weak and thin it can’t
even stand. Others have mottled skin. A third of them have aborted. For any
farmer the loss of unborn livestock is equivalent to an uninsured bank collapsing,
taking with it all your savings. A female buffalo costs at least twenty thousand
rupees. You can expect it to give twelve litres of fresh milk a day. The buffaloes
in Motipur are now giving half that yield.
Dr Yadav calls out a healthy
young boy, asks him to turn round, pulls aside his thick dark hair: underneath,
the scalp is completely bald. While we’ve been walking, a middle-aged
woman called Ramkali has been summoned and now comes in from her fields. Ramkali
pulls back her left sleeve. Her entire hand is deformed by leprosy: she’d
contracted it five year’s ago. Dr Yadav has sent her for tests at the
Medical College: they say it comes from washing in the contaminated irrigation
water.
One young farmer, one-eyed
Sunil, asks me to follow him: he wants to show me his fields. They look the
picture of health. In the centre of one field is a small pile of threshed
wheat. Sunil picks up an ear; crumbles it in his hand. The husks are empty.
An entire standing crop is in effect dead on arrival. In a healthy harvest
this field should yield one thousand kilos of wheat. This year twenty five
kilos, fit only for fodder.
All the correct things have been done. The courts
have told the state government to clean up the contaminated land, pay the
medical costs of the villagers. The state government does nothing. So the
court issues contempt notices, which are equally casually ignored.
Martine in disgust calls what has happened here
‘a crime against humanity.’ Certainly these are crimes against
their own kith and kin. The state pollution control board and the Jal Nigam
do not see themselves as evil. They are flawed human beings in a system that
makes it hard to stand up for basic moral standards. But if children and adults
in Kanpur start getting sick, even dying from drinking milk contaminated with
toxic metals, then maybe Martine isn’t exaggerating: it will be a crime
against humanity. But who to bring to justice?
Rakesh Jaiswal feels all his life’s work has been wasted.
‘Total waste of funds. Ganga Action Plan
is a complete failure. It’s neither Ganga-friendly, nor people-friendly.’
There are alternatives, and they rely on what
India has in abundance - sun and time. Vinod Tare proposes settling ponds
located on a decentralized pattern throughout Kanpur. ‘No need to centralize
everything in Jajmao,’ he says.
These settling ponds would remove forty percent
of the organic load in just three hours, reducing the total amount of sewage
that needs to be pumped to sewage treatment plants, saving the need for costly
electricity and mechanization throughout the city. The solids simply sink
to the bottom. That’s a pretty effective alternative.
It’s always tempting to try and turn the
clock back to a simpler, more innocent age. But history does not go backwards.
The Ganga Action Plan is still a good idea but it has been mis-managed from
day one. Ineffective and (possibly) inappropriate criteria were selected.
The whole operation was run badly from the start and
maintenance was scandalously
neglected.
Everyone today in Kanpur feels powerless. They
know it. They have no money to do the needful. At the same time as the Indian
economy is growing by leaps and bounds there are still staggering inefficiencies,
bordering on criminal incompetence.
Kanpur is the scene of this tragedy. Ironically,
it’s also the doorway to India’s most sacred heartland, where
millions of Indians (among them our driver Bijoy Tivari) come to worship Ganga
as the goddess.
But even though he’s visibly disturbed
by what he has seen here in Kanpur, Bijoy Tivari’s faith remains unshaken:
‘It has not lessened. I have seen this
pollution and I will tell people how much it is polluted. She will become
pure and clean again when she reaches Allahabad and beyond. This is her greatness,
how she purifies this much dirt. I do not believe Ganga will ever really dry
up, even if she has much less water.’